Some experts believe that is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.
Nowadays, elementary education program in various countries includes another language besides their mother-tongue one. Many experts approve this early approach to foreign language than starting to learn in secondary school. This essay of mine shares the same opinion.
At young age, children are more likely to mimic pronunciation better, and on the long run, they can pronounce more correctly and fluently in their adolescent and teen age. Young children are very curiosity, which really helps motivate learning. The unpressed school sessions and exercises in primary school also allow them to approach to a foreign language in an exploratory manner. In our modern days, hi-tech devices like smartphones, tablets...are very popular in daily life, and they are quite accessible to children. Using these devices from a very young age shall lower their cognition to the world around, flexibility and ability to communicate. Learning a new language is a much more useful therapy for kids to explore the world naturally. It also sets the ground for critical thinking, which will prove useful in higher level of education.
In contrast, learning too much about another language while having not yet learned enough about their mother-tongue one can make kids forget partly or use their native language improperly. Another effect is that the split of pupils. Pupils will be divided into several factions which possess different levels of using foreign language in their early education. If their ability varies greatly in one class, standardizing and teaching all of them fittingly could be challenging.
In general, I think its benefits are much more significant. About disadvantages, they can be solved with suitable policies and learning approach. Parents are also responsible for encouraging them to learn and uphold their exposure to learn. In sufficient conditions, achieving the aforementioned advantages is very likely and helps children fulfill their potential efficiently.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Nowadays, elementary education program i...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...essay of mine shares the same opinion. At young age, children are more likely t...
^^^
Line 4, column 163, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: teenage
...ly and fluently in their adolescent and teen age. Young children are very curiosity, whi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 358, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an exploratory manner" with adverb for "exploratory"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... them to approach to a foreign language in an exploratory manner. In our modern days, hi-tech devices li...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e useful in higher level of education. In contrast, learning too much about ano...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f them fittingly could be challenging. In general, I think its benefits are muc...
^^^
Line 8, column 137, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to approach'
Suggestion: to approach
...ved with suitable policies and learning approach. Parents are also responsible for encou...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, really, second, so, while, i think, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1684.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55775577558 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83874046522 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617161716172 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.7615773227 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5555555556 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8333333333 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237846948615 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688552859224 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.089648911345 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142121866254 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586084146797 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.67 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.