The chart below shows the value of one country's exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Given is bar chart providing information on the amounts of export earnings in five different sorts of a particular country from 2015 to 2016. Moreover, the table compares alternation in values of all categories during the mentioned period. Measures are shown in billions and percentages, respectively.
A brief analysis of both charts reveals that while incomes from export in 2015 for all products were less than the earnings in 2016 except gems and jewellery, percentage change only for this category experienced a reduction.
In 2016, petroleum exports saw just 3% rise from slightly more than 60 billion in 2015 to approximately 63 billion in 2016. The growth in exports for the second category, namely engineered goods, however, was better. By 8.5% climb for change in values, it went up from around 56 billion in 2015 to almost 61 billion next year.
The upward trend continued for agricultural products by a mere of 0.81%, which was depicted in the bar chart from just over 30 billion in 2015 to somewhere in the vicinity of 32 billion in 2016. Additionally, textile exports witnessed the most considerable surge by 15.24% rates from around 26 billion to about 33 billion in 2016. The pattern for gems and jewellery was in stark contrast, diminishing by 5.18% change the figure dropped from 42 billion to almost 40.5 billion in 2016.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, second, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1123.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01339285714 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74662072057 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59375 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1168082157 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.3 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253659997402 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112313447017 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731164246817 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187409564043 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0676687463372 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.