The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.

Essay topics:

The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.

The given pie charts depict a picture of three different groups of ages of the citizens of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and predictions for 2050.

To be more precise, in the year 2000, the majority of the residents in Yemen were between 0 to 14 years old, with 50.1% compared to just over 14,3% in Italy. The lowest populations of Yemen were the people who over 60 years old at 3.6%, whereas 14.3% of people below 14 years old were the weakest numbers in Italy. The largest group for Italy was the 15-59-year-old with 61.6% while Yemen had 46.3& of its population in this category.

Furthermore, the experts predicted the middle age group in Yemen will increase by 57.3%, and the citizens who below 14-year-old will be plummeted down to 37% in 2050. The proportion of over 60s is growing by just over 2%. Whereas in Italy, there will be a jumping growth to 42.3% of the 60s elderly, the percentage of those in the youngest category will drop to

11.5% and a 46.2% fall in the ratio of the group between 15 to 59-year-old.

In conclusion, there is an upward trend of the elderly above their 60's in both countries.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 107, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a below'.
Suggestion: who is a below
...ill increase by 57.3%, and the citizens who below 14-year-old will be plummeted down to 3...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 362, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...se in the youngest category will drop to 11.5% and a 46.2% fall in the ratio of t...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, whereas, while, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 923.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56930693069 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48784911053 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549504950495 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0211056335 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.375 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205474425199 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0977444161514 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108726916751 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112944130924 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126247145003 0.0819641961636 154% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.