The charts below provide the primary reason tourists visited Orange City in two different years.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two charts shows the primary reason tourists visited Orange County for two different years i.e 2006 and 2016. Both the pie charts are divided into five different categories, covering all the possible reason for tourist's visit to the county.
As it can be clearly seen, the number of tourists who visited the Orange County in 2016 is significantly greater if compared to 2006. As it stands in 2016, the number of tourists increased by almost 90 percent within a 10 year gap.
In 2006, we can clearly see that the main reason of attraction of tourists attraction were annual events held in Orange County, with about 450000 people attending that year. Also, more than a quarter of tourists in that year came to the county to visit their museums, followed by theater visits and the restaurants in the area. Very few percentage of tourists turned up to the county for reason other than this.
By 2016, there was a complete turnabout, with most of the tourists visiting the restaurants in the region, with more than 700000 people turning up for them alone. While there is a variation in percentage of people visiting for different reason, people visiting the museums took a nosedive within 10 years, with 60000 less people visiting it in the year of 2016.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 334, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun percentage seems to be countable; consider using: 'few percentages'.
Suggestion: few percentages
...s and the restaurants in the area. Very few percentage of tourists turned up to the county for...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 279, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...eason, people visiting the museums took a nosedive within 10 years, with 60000 less people...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 318, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... a nosedive within 10 years, with 60000 less people visiting it in the year of 2016....
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1046.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8202764977 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42397189464 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529953917051 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0333174754 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.222222222 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1111111111 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257372469711 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128427486228 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0891191189812 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176886602022 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0875467035675 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.