The charts below provide the primary reason tourists visited Orange City in two different years.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
You should write at least 150 words.
The pie charts in question provide primary reasons as to why tourists visited Orange City in two different years -2006 and 2016. It is reported that in 10 years the overall number of tourists almost doubled.
For the year 2006, pie chart 1 shows that annual events account for the major reasons for tourist congregation. As reported by the data, it stands at 45%. Secondly, following it the second-most popular excuse of the visitors was museums , garnering 27% of the total. Coming in the third place with 13% of visitor's choice is theater , whereas restaurants occupy 10% of the choice of any incoming traveller. Finally at the lowest rung of choices lie other miscellaneous events with only 5%
The scenario completely changes in 2016, where the pie-chart reports are dramatic rise of restaurants as the most popular wish of the traveller. It get's the lion's share of votes and jumps to 41% from 10%. As a result of this rise the yearly events get relegated to second place as voter's wishes to 32%. It sees a 13% plummet in popularity. Additionally , due to restaurant's meteoric rise museums see the maximum slump in it's tourism option rating from 27 to 11% and also lost its 2nd place. In 2016 , theaters also saw a minor dip of 2% but the anomaly was other events who climbed 3 places up, reaching 8%
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The pie charts in question provide primary reasons as to why tourists visi...
^^
Line 1, column 62, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...stion provide primary reasons as to why tourists visited Orange City in two diff...
^^
Line 2, column 13, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f tourists almost doubled. For the year 2006, pie chart 1 shows that annual even...
^^
Line 2, column 225, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cond-most popular excuse of the visitors was museums , garnering 27% of the total...
^^
Line 2, column 238, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ular excuse of the visitors was museums , garnering 27% of the total. Coming in t...
^^
Line 2, column 322, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... third place with 13% of visitors choice is theater , whereas restaurants occupy...
^^
Line 2, column 334, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... with 13% of visitors choice is theater , whereas restaurants occupy 10% of the ...
^^
Line 2, column 344, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of visitors choice is theater , whereas restaurants occupy 10% of the choice of ...
^^
Line 2, column 410, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...f the choice of any incoming traveller. Finally at the lowest rung of choices lie other...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 491, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... other miscellaneous events with only 5% The scenario completely changes in 2016,...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 353, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... 13% plummet in popularity. Additionally , due to restaurants meteoric rise museum...
^^
Line 4, column 484, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing from 27 to 11% and also lost its 2nd place. In 2016 , theaters also saw a min...
^^
Line 4, column 500, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...1% and also lost its 2nd place. In 2016 , theaters also saw a minor dip of 2% but...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, second, secondly, so, third, whereas, as to, as a result, in the third place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1076.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69868995633 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55435846865 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 106.607317073 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64192139738 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.0563414279 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.6666666667 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0833333333 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 13.0 1.69756097561 766% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164846165506 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0632049029097 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0972995392506 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152098584006 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13221056282 0.0819641961636 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.