Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
The students aims to join a particular university with a particular course in order to excel in the field they are interested in. But to say they should only require those fields in which they are interested in is an entirely different conversation.
The courses in universities are created in such a way that these courses not only cover the necessary information in order to excel in that field, but must be done so in order to make it more accessible to all the students. If students only choose some of the subjects in the course in their interest, the entire curriculum must accomodate so, including the coursework, faculty and most importantly their specialization degree. This will cause a serious imbalance as each student will need seperate undivided attention.
As said earlier, these courses are built in order to make that entire field more accessible to everyone. If they chose the course specific to their intereset, it might create a gaping hole in terms of understanding the entire field of study. Suppose, a computer engineer A has an interest in computer hardware, hence pick the relevent course to it. Then, another computer engineer B has a knack for software and picks a field relevant to it. Now, as we know a computer is a combination of both hardware and software, so they would need to work together and make each other understand it's functionality. If they would have taken a more diverse course that could cover both of them, then there would be less waste of time and resources on reaching the goal from both of them.
And finally, these courses are meant to be built in order to build an overall personality of the individual. Students do tend to avoid the subjects that they do not seek interest in. These subjects are meant to polish them into better overall individual, both in their respective field and nature wise. If students are given leeway in order to avoid these courses, there is a chance that in coming years, the students might not learn about things such as general etiquetes, work-life balance in order to keep them afloat in their industry, as these ideals are nurtured and are expected within an individual.
From the above arguements, it can be inferred that the students should not be given the entire leeway to select the course of their choice. But the policy could be modified in such a way that some subjects could be set as complusury and elective in the respective course that the individuals could get a chance to specialize in their field of choice.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 14, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'aim'.
Suggestion: aim
The students aims to join a particular university with a ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 249, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...l the students. If students only choose some of the subjects in the course in their interes...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 612, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had taken'?
Suggestion: had taken
...r understand its functionality. If they would have taken a more diverse course that could cover ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, hence, if, so, then, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2085.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 434.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80414746544 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66894384939 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.456221198157 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 666.0 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.895981179 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.647058824 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5294117647 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.47058823529 5.21951772744 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174041911672 0.243740707755 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0667887533248 0.0831039109588 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545268777161 0.0758088955206 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118109322502 0.150359130593 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0730212853248 0.0667264976115 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.