The charts below show the highest educational degree earned by King City residents, and the average household size in King City from 1950 - 2000.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two charts shown provides us with different set of infomation for the people living in King City from 1950 till 2000. The first graph shows the certain percentage of people and their highest education degrees and the second one shows us the average household size in the city.
Overall, in the first graph, there are fluctuating trends recorded for each of the four highest education degrees, some of which are either decreasing or increasing or both for the given time period. But, in second graph, the average household size has only gone downwards for the 50 year period.
In the first graph, the percentage of people with college degree and post graduate degree has increased each year from 1950 till 1990. In 1990, the percentage of college graduates peaked at 65 pecent and has slightly gone down till 2000. While it has happened, the percentage of post-graduates in King City has continued to increase till 2000.
Also, the percentage of people with either no high-school degree or high school degree has only decrease ever since 1950. The percentage of people shown in both categories were at their peak in 1950, and has continued on the downward trend ever since till they reached their nadir in 2000.
By extrapolating the information from both graphs, it can be inferred that the decrease in percentage of high-school or non high-school can be directly attributed to the decreasing average household size.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 97, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'decreased'.
Suggestion: decreased
...l degree or high school degree has only decrease ever since 1950. The percentage of peop...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1195.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02100840336 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60130186915 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487394957983 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 344.7 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4006684432 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.5 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216814713318 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0975310349496 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620815826656 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126817109443 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0848917534193 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.