The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they receive from employers.
The bar diagrams give information about the principal purpose of education among students at different ages, and how much support they receive in terms of day off or financial assistance from their employers.
Overall, it is clear that the main reason for study among younger students, is to build a career, whereas, older students are more inclined towards studying for their own interest. However, there is an extraordinary trend observed in terms of employer support for education. They tend to support younger as well as elder employees more than those who fall under middle age groups.
To begin with, 80% of students under 26 years of age study to develop a career for themselves. This trend of career-oriented education declines as the age progresses, and less than 20% of students over 49 years of age study for career progression. In contrast, only 10% of young students under 26 years of age educate themselves out of personal interest. But this interest grows as the age increases, to the extent that nearly 70% of students, who are older than 49 years, study for their own interest.
Furthermore, in terms of employer facilitation, maximum benefit is received by people under 26 years of age. This favour declines as the age progresses and hits the lowest point of 34% for 30-39-year age group. After this, there is a gradual inclination in this support for 40-49-year group, and it further increases to about 44% for people over 49 years of age.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 305, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...education. They tend to support younger as well as elder employees more than those...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, so, well, whereas, in contrast, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 5.60731707317 303% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1224.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 246.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9756097561 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72922603143 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544715447154 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 358.2 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.888709106 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.272727273 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3636363636 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332025044721 0.215688989381 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12905188795 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553063156469 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203718218436 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377329400932 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.