The diagram below shows the average growth in the domestic product in wealthy countries; counties that have adopted a global approach to business and countries that have not.
The bar chart gives information about the annual of average growth in a domestic product in three categories of countries that included: Wealthy countries, Globalisers, and Non-Globalizers. Overall, wealthy countries and Globalisers had respectively more growth in GDP rather than Non-Globaliser or developing countries. As can see, Wealthy or developed countries had exponential growth in domestic products in the 1960s, while in 1970s; they had a decreasing trend of 3.0 %. The obvious changes from these countries were decreased trend from 5.0 % to about 2.0 percent in the 1990s.
The other category has shown in this chart is for Globaliser countries, which are adopting a Non-Global approach to business. We can see that these countries had increasingly trend reverse developed countries. The highest growth for them was in the 1990s by 50 percent, while before that decade they had relatively growth in their GDP. On the other hand, Non-Globalisers in the 1960s with around 1.5 % were in low-level for the rate of GDP between two other categories countries that mentioned. In the 1970s and 1980s, they had growth with 2.5 % and 3. % respectively had significant rose in their GDP.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 429, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1970s'.
Suggestion: in the 1970s
...n domestic products in the 1960s, while in 1970s; they had a decreasing trend of 3.0 %. ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 176, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'trended'.
Suggestion: trended
...e that these countries had increasingly trend reverse developed countries. The highes...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1002.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32978723404 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07812143021 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585106382979 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.4335951812 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.2 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199971754056 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0864556731731 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653660917538 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168798680125 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544916882595 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.