Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.

Essay topics:

Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.

Needless to say, one of the most important things for all children, because of its impacts on all aspects of their lives, is education. Therefore, all parents have always been trying to encourage their children to pursue fields of study which they can be success individuals based on their knowledge in the future. In this regard, some people believe that it is responsibility of educational institutions to encourage students to pursue fields which help them to find suitable job positions in the future. I agree with this statement and I will discuss my reasons in the following paragraphs.

Educational institutions can easily reveal students' talents as the most important thing in students' lives that help them to gain success life. In this regard, some psychologists believe that educational institutions are not able to help students to pursue best filed, which can help them to be success person in the future, because they interact with students in short time in every day, hence they do not know much things about students' family relations as the most important thing which shape students' interests. I disagree with this approach, because in the modern time educational institutions usually try to gain information about children's family relationships as much as they can, in order to know more about children mental situations to help students in order to find fields of study that they have to pursue. You can take my cousin as the best example for this case. Now he is around 12 years old and he is studying in one good school where the manager of school tries to have session with his parents every month in order to understand his family relationships. Thus, educational institutions have the most important role to guide students in order to choose best fields.

Teachers have the most impact on their students. According to the majority of sociologists, approximately in all cultures teachers have high social positions among people. Therefore, they have argued that teachers can have big impact on individuals especially students who teachers have more interact with. Hence, these sociologists believe that because of this huge range of impacts educational institutions are able to draw suitable pass for all students by help them to avoid choosing fields which they cannot gain suitable job positions in the future. I agree with this approach because teachers have a lot of experiences about fields of study that can help students to choose best of them. By way of illustration, I can refer to some statistics which have been published by some international organization. Based on these statistics, approximately all success individuals had had good teachers or they had studied in excellent educational institutions that helped them to find fields of study that they like. Thus, teachers are one of the most important factor which influence our successful.

In brief, as I discussed in the previous paragraphs, some people believe that educational institutions have big responsibility about choosing fields of study by students. In this regard, I argued that this statement is correct for a couple of reasons. First, educational institutions can reveal students' talents as the most important things for all individuals, second, teachers because of their high social position are able to encourage students to avoid form choosing not suitable fields of study.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 451, Rule ID: HELP_TO_FIND[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'help them find' instead.
Suggestion: help them find
...courage students to pursue fields which help them to find suitable job positions in the future. I...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 375, Rule ID: ANINFOR_EVERY_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'in everyday'?
Suggestion: in everyday
...ey interact with students in short time in every day, hence they do not know much things abo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 412, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...me in every day, hence they do not know much things about students family relations ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 878, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: had
..., approximately all success individuals had had good teachers or they had studied in ex...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 502, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... choosing not suitable fields of study.
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, second, so, therefore, thus, in brief, in short

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 1.00243902439 1097% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 20.0 3.15609756098 634% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 59.0 5.60731707317 1052% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 91.0 33.7804878049 269% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2848.0 965.302439024 295% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 545.0 196.424390244 277% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22568807339 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83169070408 3.73543355544 129% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88964320905 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 106.607317073 192% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.376146788991 0.547539520022 69% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 871.2 283.868780488 307% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 1.53170731707 522% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 8.94146341463 235% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.8016247938 43.030603864 185% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.619047619 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9523809524 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.09523809524 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 3.70975609756 404% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344194214069 0.215688989381 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12028205053 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0860987725225 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2498052226 0.15604864568 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0219906158186 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 40.7170731707 221% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.