The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.
The figures show water usage by sector- namely agriculture, industrial and domestic, and 2000’s water expenditure in Brazil and Congo.
It is evident that, in the past century international water usage had rocket up dramatically, particularly in the agriculture section.
In terms of use, the agriculture was the most used water section. In this two countries water management of industrial and domestic factions had negligibly above 0 km3 in the 1900 and had been increasing in the vicinity of 100 km3 until 1950. Domestic expenditure of water slowly rose approximate 300 km3, while industrial water usage steadily increase at above 1000 km3 by the 2000. Surprisingly, agriculture’s water management soared remarkably from 500 km3 to 3000km3.
On the other hand, a brazilian uses 359m3 water and has 26500km2 plain and 176 million citizens. While within 5,2 million Congo occupies 100 km2 irrigated land, then one Congo resident uses 8 m3 water in the 2000. To sum up, Brazil has a larger farm land and great expenditure of water compared to the other country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 32, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'use'?
Suggestion: use
...000km3. On the other hand, a brazilian uses 359m3 water and has 26500km2 plain and ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then, while, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 904.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22543352601 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04251672397 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612716763006 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.2224199282 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.444444444 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230439258591 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111856172268 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0384500299231 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13787901855 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401109393563 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.