Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however, think that change is always a good thing.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
It is evident that in society there are two perspectives of how to live, and those opinions tends to opposite each other. Some adults prefer uniform life activity, however, others enjoy a tendency of the adventure life. Indeed, I cheer both opinion same way.
First of all, the safe players enjoy peaceful life and acknowledged activities. To be more accurate, they tend to think that the life is short and precious, so do not do any reckless things just live with safe jubilant life. In fact, the thought is true and gives a number of steady development to the civilization. For example, the Athens Greece’s capital is the oldest city in the world was built by citizens who lived smooth life, expanding over 3400 years. It indicates that the ancient peace-loving citizens established many glorious momentum. But, this kind of tendency can lead to boxed mind or dreary life.
On the other hand, high-voltage individuals can’t stand in humdrum experience. They love to see new a various type of environment, action and culture. This attitude obviously have advantages, for example, the brave voyagers have discovered continents of America and Australia. Another salient example is the renaissance of Europe. But too much enthusiast can bring disasters, extreme sports have achieved more audience. A bull of the Spain bull fight injured spectators when the bull had jumped over fence.
To sum up, the attitudes have vantages and weakness. Being uniform means the safety, whereas being active means exciting life. In my opinion, these perspectives both should be in individual nine life. Maybe humdrum attitude just be little more than feat life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 530, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun momentum seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much glorious momentum', 'a good deal of glorious momentum'.
Suggestion: much glorious momentum; a good deal of glorious momentum
...cient peace-loving citizens established many glorious momentum. But, this kind of tendency can lead to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, then, thus, whereas, for example, in fact, kind of, first of all, in my opinion, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1392.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17472118959 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72392046122 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68029739777 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.572203764 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.2631578947 106.682146367 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1578947368 20.7667163134 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.52631578947 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109443658629 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0306448786137 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478715793254 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0683629447799 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555409543238 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.11 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.