The graph below shows information on employment rates across 6 countries in 1995 and 2005.Summarise the information by choosing and describe the main idea, and make comparisons where appropriate.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows information on employment rates across 6 countries in 1995 and 2005.

Summarise the information by choosing and describe the main idea, and make comparisons where appropriate.

The bar chart compares the employment rate of men and women workers in 1995 and 2005 between six countries around the world. And it has shown that the employment rates in Iceland and Switzerland were higher than other countries. Also, in all six countries, more men were employed than women both in 1995 and 2005. But the employment rates of women had improved from 1995 to 2005.

It is easy to witness an improvement in employment between 1995 and 2005. The biggest change was in the United Kingdom, from 55 percent of men in 1995 to 73 percent in 2005. Besides, the increases in employment rates for women were much higher in New Zealand, which reached at about 41% from 25%. Over 10% or higher increases were be seem in other countries in 10 years.

In Australia and New Zealand, they had lowest number of women be employed in 1995, although the number of it had increased until 2005, the rates of Australia still was the lowest among six countries.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 332, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
... 25%. Over 10% or higher increases were be seem in other countries in 10 years. ...
^^
Line 9, column 36, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the lowest'.
Suggestion: had the lowest
... In Australia and New Zealand, they had lowest number of women be employed in 1995, al...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, so, still

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 793.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66470588235 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39729518864 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505882352941 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 214.2 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.8930156541 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.1111111111 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180940044305 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0971665494631 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488899804039 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129931459834 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0458189086537 0.0819641961636 56% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.04 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.