The graph below shows the number of complaints made about noise to Environmental Health authorities in the city of Newtown between 1980 and 1996.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph indicates the information of people’s complaints toward four kinds of noise resources from the year 1980 to 1996 in Newtown. A remarkable change shown that the number of complaints toward household noise decreased from the top in 1980 to the lowest in 1996, while sound came from road works had raised into top in 1980.
From the graph, it shown in 1980 the domestic noise was complained most by people in Newtown. Followed by it was Road works and factories which the Environmental Health authorities received 500 and 400 complaints respectively. The traffic noise was complained lowest by people in 1980. The number of complaints in domestic noise decreased slightly with time went by and overcame by the figure for factories noise in 1982. It then overcame by road works and traffic noise in 1983 and 1989 respectively.
The complaints toward road works had leveled off in 500 from 1980 to 1984. And the number decreased to 400 in 1986 and then stayed in it for two years. But a sharp increase had been witnessed from 1988 to 1994 and it even overcame the figure for factories noise in 1990 which made the road works became the highest one received complaints.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 250, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'complained the lowest'.
Suggestion: complained the lowest
...nts respectively. The traffic noise was complained lowest by people in 1980. The number of compla...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 993.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86764705882 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62842021924 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.450980392157 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9756457268 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205426644671 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946487628063 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511008228069 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148453493865 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540384339096 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.72 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.