The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph shows enquire received by the tourist information officer over six months of period, January to June in particular city.
Following chart shows the three different way of communication with information office, in persona, by letter and telephone inquiries. The numbers of personal office visitor was around 450 in January and slightly increased from March where 800 tourists were visited to information office. Mean while the numbers of emailing visitors was around 700 at January. Science then the email user was dramatically reduced till May and remains constant at the end of June at approximately 350.
On the other hand the numbers of telephone user visitor was nearly 900 at January and it is slightly ups and down till April, at 1000. After March there were steadily increase in phone user numbers and reached at 1600 at the end of June. Same as the personal meeting visitors was rose dramatically from the end of March and reached on the pick around 1900 at the end of June.
Over all the static of tourist who inquirers by email has been in decreasing trend comparison to other two method of informed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 290, Rule ID: MEAN_WHILE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'meanwhile'?
Suggestion: Meanwhile
...sts were visited to information office. Mean while the numbers of emailing visitors was ar...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, then, while, in particular, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 936.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92631578947 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5990409482 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563157894737 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.7194374822 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.0 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16760487882 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.085714819615 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113194855988 0.0843802449381 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149210052263 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136511896823 0.0819641961636 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.