The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.

This line graph illustrates data from 1974-2002 in UK about the transportation of the material by using the following factors such as road, water, rail, and pipeline.

The most striking feature of this graph is extensive growth shown by the factors. A road transportation is the most useful way of transportation. In early, 1974 it was stared from 70 million tonnes and till 1994 with certain ups and downs reached at 79 mark after that steel raising registered and in 2002 it was ended at 98 which was zenith among all factors.

The rail and the water almost started from 40 million tonnes mark but after 1978 gowth was vice versa till 1985. From 1978 rail has downfall whereas, water registered gain . 1998 to 2002 both of them constantly increasing, In 2002 rail ended at just above 40, while, water crossed 60 million tonnes mark.

Pipeline transportation show cumulative growth, where it was started from 5 mark in 1974 and in 2002 it was reached at just above 20 million figure.

Overall, all factors registered raised in 2002 their values as compared to 1974 .

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 168, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uch as road, water, rail, and pipeline. The most striking feature of this grap...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... which was zenith among all factors. The rail and the water almost started fr...
^^^
Line 5, column 64, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er almost started from 40 million tonnes mark but after 1978 gowth was vice versa...
^^
Line 5, column 176, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... downfall whereas, water registered gain . 1998 to 2002 both of them constantly in...
^^
Line 5, column 310, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., water crossed 60 million tonnes mark. Pipeline transportation show cumulati...
^^^^
Line 7, column 57, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sportation show cumulative growth, where it was started from 5 mark in 1974 and i...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hed at just above 20 million figure. Overall, all factors registered raised i...
^^^
Line 9, column 83, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...in 2002 their values as compared to 1974 .
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, whereas, while, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 893.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85326086957 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61042406392 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597826086957 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1869700702 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2222222222 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167041591584 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793113184224 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669752450144 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116101758993 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618393301403 0.0819641961636 75% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.