The graph shows the hours spent in different study methods during a two year course.
The line graph illustrates the several hours students spend for studying on lectures and classes, library and Internet. At first glance, it is evident that the number of hours spent on Internet significantly increase from year 1 to year 2.
It can be seen from the graph that the hours students spend to study on lectures and classes was the highest in semester 1 of year 1, at 7 hours; slightly rising to 8 hours in semester 2. By contrast, the time used for library was only 4 hours in semester 1 and continuously decreased to 3 hours in semester 2. However, the amount of time spent in library gradually increased to 8 hours in semester 1 of year 2 and then falling to 6 hours in the following semester. The figures for lectures and classes also decreased to 5 hours in year 2.
In semester 1 of year 1, the time spent for Internet was the lowest, at 3 hours. However, to semester 2 this figure grew to 6 hours, overtaking the time used for library and classes in year 2. Finally, it reached a peak at 11 hours in semester 2 of year 2.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cantly increase from year 1 to year 2. It can be seen from the graph that the h...
^^^
Line 3, column 139, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he highest in semester 1 of year 1, at 7 hours; slightly rising to 8 hours in sem...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s also decreased to 5 hours in year 2. In semester 1 of year 1, the time spent ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 853.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.35204081633 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6053550322 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.423469387755 0.547539520022 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4699879904 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7777777778 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23546777933 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129324982831 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458816656175 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190949927846 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04972040981 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.95 11.4140731707 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.85 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.