The graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of a maJor university in 2012.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart indicates the proportion of academic staff members of a university across seven different faculties based on gender in the year 2012.
Overall, it can be seen that there was a significant difference between the percentage of male and female staff in Engineering faculty. In addition, there were generally more male staff than female, with the exception of Arts and Education faculties.
As displayed in the chart, Engineering faculty had the biggest difference in terms of the proportions between men and women staff, with more than 80% of men worked there while the percentage for women were less than 20%. On the other hand, far more women worked in Education department than men, with around 40% in difference (78% of female staff and only 22% of male)
Furthermore, the highest figure of women staff was in the Education field with 78%, while the lowest was in Engineering faculty, with less than 20%, which was completely contrast to male figures. Last but not least, Medicine faculty had an equal balance of gender, with male and female staff proportions were distributed evenly at around 50%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 200, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
... generally more male staff than female, with the exception of Arts and Education faculties. As dis...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 933.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07065217391 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63648580873 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548913043478 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.868385442 43.030603864 183% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.5 112.824112599 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.6666666667 22.9334400587 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.83333333333 5.23603664747 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170758203961 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109299211225 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617972150388 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133422093632 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0621412851867 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 61.2550243902 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.72 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.