The graph shows the results of a survey of British public figures that people can recognise from their photographs.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates levels of people identification for 4 British figure based on their photographs among 4 ages different groups.
In summary, the vast percentages of people who among the 4 groups surveyed the 41 to 60 age group does the best perform at recognizing public figures, whereas, the performance of those aged 20 and lowest seems to be the least impressive.
As to the bar chart, the queen is the highest recognized, with everyone ages 21 and above and the majority of those who are less than 20 to find her. The Prime Minister is recognized by up to 90% of public aged 41 to 60. Followed by the 80% of the 21-40 group, around the second third of the over 60 age group and only half of the youngest age group.
Chancellor and mayor of London are both identified by only 20% of those under 20. However, while the people age over 40 is identifiable for up to 70 and the later is more recognized across the 21-40 and 41-60 age groups ( both at 60% ).
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 73, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'figure' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'figures'.
Suggestion: figures
... of people identification for 4 British figure based on their photographs among 4 ages...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 220, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed across the 21-40 and 41-60 age groups both at 60% .
^^
Line 7, column 233, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... 21-40 and 41-60 age groups both at 60% .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, second, third, whereas, while, as to, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 790.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.43820224719 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57338835831 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584269662921 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7872714248 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.857142857 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 5.23603664747 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.057846383101 0.215688989381 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0330068359351 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400282679173 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0509133292054 0.15604864568 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042322765756 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.77 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.