The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The given map depicts the village Ryemouth’s development from 1995 till now. Overall, there was a growth in houses in residential area as well as an increase in facilities such as the car park but some buildings of the village were demolished or replaced and decreased in size.
In 1995, there were eight houses along the road and four ones in the south but the number of them began to increase to 10 for ones located on the street and 6 for the ones in the southern location. Additionally, the road was widened. Besides, the village had only one hotel in the past whereas now it stands with one more car park in the east side. However, the northern farmland and the forest park was converted to a joint area in smaller size: the golf and tennis court. Similarly, the shop on the left bottom was knocked down in replacement for the restaurant. In addition, on the left-hand bottom of the map where the fish market once was there and being destructed to make room for apartments. In the middle of the map to the south in the present day, the fishing port is no longer there as it used to be years ago. In contrast, the café remains unchanged between 1995 and now.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 823, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...onger there as it used to be years ago. In contrast, the café remains unchanged be...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, similarly, so, well, whereas, in addition, in contrast, such as, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 956.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.46728971963 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44455058921 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565420560748 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6245987638 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 5.23603664747 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132481604067 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0563211052542 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067012307821 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114901832074 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237054204785 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.