The maps below show the layout of James Park in 2017 and the proposed changes to the park in 2027.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words
The pictures in question represent the present and future layout (after incorporating some changes) of James Park in 2017 and 2027 respectively with a mention of the present and proposed future number of visitors.
As evident from the schematics that the place in question is about to experience a barrage of improvements and upgrades. In 2017 the area housed only a toddler playground and a science center in addition to a main playing ground, a statue and a fountain. The roads connecting each of them was not sufficient and layout fairly simple. There is no direct road leading to the science center. In 2027 James Park is getting a facelift and as per the proposed design plan , it will not only hold the oldies like the effigy, playground ,and science center(which is more expansive ) but also add into itself a garden , a gymnasium and a theater. The roadway network will be more dense and interconnective , ensuring to every part of the place is well -connected. Vital structures like playground and theater are connected by more than one lane. As a result of the renovations the toddler playground and are removed. Also such a move is expected to quadruple the number of visitors from 5000.
So it is pretty obvious from the diagrams that after undergoing a massive renovation work , the Park will be much larger and complex on the contrary will be more visitor-attractive
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 466, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...lift and as per the proposed design plan , it will not only hold the oldies like t...
^^
Line 3, column 529, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...d the oldies like the effigy, playground ,and science centerwhich is more expansiv...
^^
Line 3, column 572, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd science centerwhich is more expansive but also add into itself a garden , a gy...
^^
Line 3, column 607, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nsive but also add into itself a garden , a gymnasium and a theater. The roadway ...
^^
Line 3, column 695, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...k will be more dense and interconnective , ensuring to every part of the place is ...
^^
Line 3, column 907, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...the toddler playground and are removed. Also such a move is expected to quadruple th...
^^^^
Line 5, column 90, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ter undergoing a massive renovation work , the Park will be much larger and comple...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, in addition, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1144.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88888888889 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9044647601 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564102564103 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 351.9 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.2509901842 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2727272727 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12520701577 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0367425832282 0.103423049105 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541751364862 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0955266459258 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0593557393195 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.