The maps below show the layout of James Park in 2017 and the proposed changes to the park in 2027 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The maps below show the layout of James Park in 2017 and the proposed changes to the park in 2027.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The first maps shows the layout of James Park in 2017, currently used 5000 active users each month. And the second map is a proposed change of the same location for the year 2027, with 20000 expected monthly users.

If you look at it carefully, some major changes were made for the pathways in the proposed plan. In 2017, the path only leads to two location in the park. But in 2027, each and every path leads to all the allocated locations in the park, with several paths made around the statue and expanded further.

In 2027, some major additions were made in the park. The science center will be expanded further. Also, the park saw the addition of garden situated alongside the science center and gymnasium, which is made in the empty space present near the main playground.

By 2027, major overhauls were made in some regions of the park. The entire toddler playground was then converted to a theater. The fountain in the current plans was completely removed in order to accomadate spaces for both science center and garden.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 16, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'show'.
Suggestion: show
The first maps shows the layout of James Park in 2017, curre...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, second, so, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 858.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74033149171 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.23454539582 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574585635359 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.1320021344 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.0 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4545454545 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227831490979 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0906753374451 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0721099218206 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142598814934 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0749345585057 0.0819641961636 91% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.2329268293 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.