The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
The given combination of circular and tabular data shows that causes of less productive agricultural land and how it affected three continent of the world during the 1990s.
As clearly seen as, over-grazing is a main reason for worldwide degradation and contribute about 35% with first position, whereas deforestation is an inevitable in causes of land degradation, which is an accounted by 30 percent. Furthermore, excessive cultivation is another factor in land degradation by 28% worldwide.
Moving further, considering the effects of land degradation on different parts of the world; over-gazing is a main problem in Oceania about 11.3 percent, while in North-America it is not considerable problem. Moreover, Europe vulnerable to the over-cultivation about more than 7 percent, while in Oceania cultivation is not major cause. Furthermore, higher degradation clearly seen as in Europe follwed by Oceania and North-America corresponding about 23, 13 and 5 percent.
Overall, North-America is affected by land degradation with smaller proportion. Secondly, Europe is a more effected due to deforestation and cultivation. Over-grazing is the prominent issue in all three parts of the land.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 133, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'continent' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'continents'.
Suggestion: continents
...cultural land and how it affected three continent of the world during the 1990s. As cl...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 3.97073170732 378% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1027.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70555555556 4.92477711251 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.49681954261 2.65546596893 132% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577777777778 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6714594923 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.111111111 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186237704851 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0816336195108 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11818786497 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152014764527 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.146357274738 0.0819641961636 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 61.2550243902 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.3012195122 131% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.4140731707 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.