The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
The given pie graph gives information about, how the four factors impact on the production of agricultural grounds in three areas. The given table illustrates these regions and how a previous reasons leave a huge effects throughout 1990s in past century.
In general, Although the most implication on agricultural lands was over-grazing, there has been small impact for this reason in North America.
First of all, from Pie charts, it is seen that, the two highest causes for degradation were over-grazing and deforestation by 35%, 30% respectively. furthermore, the other reasons occupy the least effect on agricultural land, it was just 7%.
From table, it can be noticed that, the impact of over-grazing was 1.5% in North America, it is not as many as the effect of deforestation for the same area, it was just 0.2%. over cultivation occupy the most implication on degradation in North America, it was just 3.3%. nevertheless, Oceania did not expose of over-cultivation, overall, the highest total land degraded effect peaked at 23% in Europe. Whereas, the lowest total land degraded impact was in North America by 5%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'reason'?
Suggestion: reason
...trates these regions and how a previous reasons leave a huge effects throughout 1990s i...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...and how a previous reasons leave a huge effects throughout 1990s in past century. In g...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 123, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion were over-grazing and deforestation by 35%, 30% respectively. furthermore...
^^^
Line 3, column 137, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...-grazing and deforestation by 35%, 30% respectively. furthermore, the other rea...
^^^^
Line 3, column 154, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Furthermore
...estation by 35%, 30% respectively. furthermore, the other reasons occupy the least eff...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 176, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Over
...on for the same area, it was just 0.2%. over cultivation occupy the most implication...
^^^^
Line 4, column 272, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Nevertheless
...ion in North America, it was just 3.3%. nevertheless, Oceania did not expose of over-cultiva...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 403, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...egraded effect peaked at 23% in Europe. Whereas, the lowest total land degraded impact ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 478, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aded impact was in North America by 5%.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, nevertheless, so, whereas, in general, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 944.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15846994536 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06093860737 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595628415301 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2597805839 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.888888889 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13744670861 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0666593853089 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582786639425 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103577235733 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688383992231 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.