The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during 1990.
The circular chart illustrate about the four causes of the land degradation, and the tabular chart raveals about the affected degrated land in three regions during the year 1990. The data is calculated in the percentum.
It is clearly seen from the given pie chart that , about 28 percent of the land was degrated due to the cause of over cultivation during the year 1990.
After that, 30 percent of the land was degrated due to the deforestation. Furthermore, the highest number of land was degrated due to overgrazing i.e 35 percent , and at last, only 7 percent of the land was degrated due to the other reasons.
Secondly, in the given tabular chart, it is seen that during the year 1990, in America, 5 percent of the total land was degraded due to the deforestation, over-cultivation and over-grazing with the ratio 0.2 : 3.3 : 1.5 . Moreover , the highest land was degraded in Europe with total 23 percent and the ratio of their causes are 9.8 : 7.7 : 5.5 . At the last in Oceania, about 13 percent of the total land was degraded with the ratio 1.7 : 0 :11.3 respectively.
Overall, it is evident that , overgrazing activity is the main cause of the land degradation as compare to the other two causes especially in Europe region during 1990
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The circular chart illustrate about the ...
^^^
Line 4, column 49, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...early seen from the given pie chart that , about 28 percent of the land was degrat...
^^
Line 5, column 160, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...grated due to overgrazing i.e 35 percent , and at last, only 7 percent of the land...
^^
Line 7, column 220, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...r-grazing with the ratio 0.2 : 3.3 : 1.5 . Moreover , the highest land was degrade...
^^
Line 7, column 231, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ith the ratio 0.2 : 3.3 : 1.5 . Moreover , the highest land was degraded in Europe...
^^
Line 7, column 345, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...atio of their causes are 9.8 : 7.7 : 5.5 . At the last in Oceania, about 13 percen...
^^
Line 9, column 28, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ectively. Overall, it is evident that , overgrazing activity is the main cause ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, moreover, second, secondly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1033.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78240740741 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77231498308 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.462962962963 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6366534266 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.777777778 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187515527486 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0958940801054 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0826056860373 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143195522893 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0721282151572 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.