The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
The pie chart illustrate the information about the key reasons why agricultural land become causes of worldwide land degradation, and the table provide data about how these causes affected North America, Europe, and Oceania area during the 1990s.
Overall, Europe was the most significant degraded land, while North America was the least. In addition, the Oceania region has zero percent of Over-cultivation.
Firstly, in the 1990s, 30% deforestation which causes of worldwide land degradation, and 35% was over-grazing. The over-cultivation was 28% effect the agricultural land, and becomes less productive, and only 7% other things which land degradation.
Subsequently, in North America total land degraded by 5%: 2% of the land was deforestation, 3.3% of the area was over-cultivation, and remaining percentage area was over-grazing.
Lastly, the highest area degraded in Europe 23%, and Oceania region degraded 13%. In Oceania 1.7% deforestation and 9.8% deforestation in Europe. In Europe 7.7% over-cultivation, and Oceania 0%. In contrast, 11.3% over-grazing in Oceania, and 5.5% in Europe.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 196, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... 7.7% over-cultivation, and Oceania 0%. In contrast, 11.3% over-grazing in Oceania...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, lastly, so, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 946.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.76829268293 4.92477711251 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.47834723175 2.65546596893 131% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542682926829 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 0.482926829268 1864% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 59.1222462361 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205275443183 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0771638987923 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110314441769 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127292534096 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13319411326 0.0819641961636 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.89 11.4140731707 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.