The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The provided pie chart demonstrates the information on why agricultural land becomes less productive whereas the table illustrates three different continents around the globe (North America, Europe, and Oceania) that how the land causes affected during 1990s.
According to the chart, it is clear that overgrazing was the main issue of the land degradation. It was almost third (35%) that cause farmland. While, other two, over-cultivation and deforestation was remained stable at 28% and 30% respectively which was lower cause than previous one. Other causes of globe farmland was at minority (7%).
The table beholds the three different areas. It is clear evident that, North America caused lowest proportion of land degradation where Europe had caused the highest proportion. The Europe had caused 9.8% due to the deforestation, while North America and Oceania had minimal degradation at 0.2% and 1.7% respectively. Europe also suffered from over-cultivation at 7.7%, again here, North America had 3.3%, while Oceania had no proportion. After that, in over-grazing, Oceania suffered at 11.3% which was highest in this field, where Europe had 5.5% degradation and North America had 1.5%.
Overall, both in pie chart and in table, over-grazing had suffered around the globe and by region.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 245, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'during the 1990s'.
Suggestion: during the 1990s
...eania that how the land causes affected during 1990s. According to the chart, it is clear...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 86, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'caused the lowest'.
Suggestion: caused the lowest
...It is clear evident that, North America caused lowest proportion of land degradation where Eu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1093.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.465 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9497415141 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 325.8 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.6520768234 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3636363636 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1818181818 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.18181818182 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164682658093 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742149986544 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.090929083234 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133407474573 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116987639642 0.0819641961636 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.09 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.