The pie charts below give information about world population living in various areas in 1900 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given graphs illustrate fractions of human population in different parts of the world in 1900 and in 2000.
Overall, it is clearly seen, that the portion of asians and europeans diminished in the 20th century, in contrast to African and Latin American population. In addition, the number of people on the planet rose from 1.6 billion to 6 billion.
In 1900 three-fifth of human beings on Earth were people from Asia. However, the percentage of them dropped slightly to 54 per cent in 2000. The similar pattern is observed in figures for Europe, which includes Russia in this data, with one quarter at the beginning of the 20th century and only 14 per cent at the end. Meanwhile, the percentage of North America and others remained the same with 8 per cent, collectively.
Unlike Asia and Europe, the fraction of Latin America's and Africa's population experienced a sharp increase during the time period. They stood at 3 and 4 per cent in 1900, respectively, and reached 8 per cent in Latin America and one-tenth in Africa in 2000. Additionally, the Middle East and North Africa appeared in statistics only in 2000 with 6 per cent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 46, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...00 three-fifth of human beings on Earth were people from Asia. However, the percenta...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while, in addition, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 947.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83163265306 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69037244913 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581632653061 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.6643728592 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0718098581037 0.215688989381 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0336006109845 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430555838744 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0582863902193 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569152020702 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.