Some people believe that it is okay to accept the situation that they are in regardless the situation not being what they have worked for, whereas other believe that it is best to thrive and overcome the situation for better life. I believe the person's physical and economic background has a greater impact to decide on either of this situation whereas personally I prefer the later side of the discussion.
During certain condition people are compelled to accept the situation that they are in as there are no other choices available . For instance, A MBA graduate who have to look after a family of 5 will be compelled to work as a waiter in circumstance where there are other jobs unavailable that fits his education background. Such people know to adjust and accept their situation but there are chances of them being frustrated and burn out while getting involved in unsatisfactory jobs,
whereas, there are other group of people, who try their level best to overcome the unfavorable situation, for such people life satisfaction play a imperial role. lets take christiano Ronaldo as example, Eventhough he had a very difficult childhood where he didn't have enough money to get any football coach, he worked very hard and was able to get into national football team of Portugal. such people try their level best and in return get what they have worked hard for,
To sum up, I think it is best for the person to work hard and overcome the unsatisfactory situation however where there are no choices available , it is also necessary for the person to accept the situation that they are in.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 127, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... as there are no other choices available For instance A MBA graduate who have to ...
^^
Line 3, column 389, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and accept their situation but there are chances of them being frustrated and bur...
^^
Line 5, column 25, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'groups'?
Suggestion: groups
...factory jobs whereas there are other group of people who try their level best to o...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 143, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... for such people life satisfaction play a imperial role lets take christiano Rona...
^
Line 5, column 253, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...had a very difficult childhood where he didnt have enough money to get any football c...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 144, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ver where there are no choices available it is also necessary for the person to a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, so, whereas, while, for instance, i think, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 27.0 5.60731707317 482% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1307.0 965.302439024 135% => OK
No of words: 274.0 196.424390244 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7700729927 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58043650676 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478102189781 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 426.6 283.868780488 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 274.0 22.4926829268 1218% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1307.0 112.824112599 1158% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 274.0 22.9334400587 1195% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 82.0 5.23603664747 1566% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287222998461 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.287222998461 0.103423049105 278% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18313356527 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445041447129 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 138.0 13.2329268293 1043% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -206.63 61.2550243902 -337% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 110.2 10.3012195122 1070% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.87 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 19.7 8.06136585366 244% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 54.0 11.4329268293 472% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 111.6 10.9970731707 1015% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 54.0 11.0658536585 488% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.