The table below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where revelant.
The provided tabels illustrate the comparative sales data for Fairtrade coffee and bananas of 5 countries in Europe from 1999 to 2004.
A glance at the grasphs reveals that there was an increase in the statistic of both coffee and bananas in these 5 states. With regards to the highest position of UK in coffee and Switzerland in bananas while the lowest figure belongs to Sweden and Denmark.
It could be clearly observed from the first table that the fair price of coffee in UK rose dramatically, from 1.5 and reached 20 million euros in the year of 2004. Switzerland moved upward exactly double, from 3 to 6. Meanwhile, there was a similar increase in Denmark and Sweden sales, 1.8-2 and 0.8-1 million euros respectively. Finally, fair price in Belgium had a tediously growth, from 1 to 1.7 million euros.
Turning to the other table, it was apparently seen that Switzerland standed out as much higher fair price in bananas than the 4 other countries. Its data jumped more than tripple in 2004, from 15 to 47 million euros during these 5 years. At that time, banana sales improved moderately from 1-5.5 million euros in UK and 0,6-4 million euros in Belgium. However, this figure in Sweden and Denmark showed the different pattern, falling in banana sales from 1.8-1 and 2-0.9 million euros.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 367, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('tediously') instead an adjective, or a noun ('growth') instead of another adjective.
...ely. Finally, fair price in Belgium had a tediously growth, from 1 to 1.7 million euros. Turni...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, finally, first, however, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1081.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84753363229 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48449109726 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547085201794 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.5092085361 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2727272727 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2727272727 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.18181818182 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113958997514 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0485891869127 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476486676128 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0917286266627 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526900758795 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.