The table below shows the number of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year it was refurbished. The charts show the results of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.
The table illustrates how much people visited Ashdown Museum during the year before refurbishment works and during the year after while the bar charts compare results of surveys about visitor’s satisfaction by visiting museum in the two same period of time.
Overall, it can be seen that after reconstruction works Ashdown Museum visited more people than before works and that an overwhelming majority of people were satisfied by works.
The number of people who visited Ashdown Museum constituted 74000 before it was refurbished but there was significant growth in the number of visitors after reconstruction works to reach total 92 000.
The number of people who were “very satisfied” by visiting the museum raised exponentially from 15 to 35 and people who answered that they were “Satisfied” increased by 10 and accounted for 40 after refurbishment works.
Before refurbishment work 40 people were “dissatisfied” by the museum then the number fell by 15 after works and there was a twofold decline in the number of Very dissatisfied after renovation. No response figure was the same before and after works which comprised 5.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 27, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
The table illustrates how much people visited Ashdown Museum during th...
^^^^
Line 1, column 248, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...tion by visiting museum in the two same period of time. Overall, it can be seen that after re...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 988.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42857142857 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.46932666504 2.65546596893 131% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521978021978 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.1100841974 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.666666667 112.824112599 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.3333333333 22.9334400587 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294565838571 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169129287455 0.103423049105 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123314826316 0.0843802449381 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189226285488 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126468746522 0.0819641961636 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 13.2329268293 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 61.2550243902 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.3012195122 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.81 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 11.4329268293 179% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 21.0 11.0658536585 190% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.