The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The table illustrates forest areas in six regions of the world over a 15-year period. These areas are measured in millions of hectares.
The most prominent trend is for forested land to shrink over the examined period, except for Asia and Europe, where the reversed is true. Also, Oceania stands out for having substantially less forested land than other regions.
In detail, the forest area in South America recorded a significant drop, from 946 to 882, which is similar the reduction seen in Africa (from 749 to 691). A less marked decrease was also witnessed in North America, where the 1990 figure of 709 for its forested land dip to 705 in 2005. Oceania, which was home to the smallest area of forest, experienced a negligible decline.
By contrast, Asia and Europe followed the opposite pattern. While the land with forest in Asia has a net increase of 8 from 1990 to 2005, with a small drop of 6 in the interim, that in Europe increased continuously, from 989 to slightly over 1000 between 1990 and 2005. It should be noted that Europe accommodates largest areas of forest in all three years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 161, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rom 1990 to 2005, with a small drop of 6 in the interim, that in Europe increased...
^^
Line 7, column 303, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'accommodates the largest'.
Suggestion: accommodates the largest
...nd 2005. It should be noted that Europe accommodates largest areas of forest in all three years. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... areas of forest in all three years.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 923.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80729166667 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51047609715 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614583333333 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.1241802095 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.3 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117249062426 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0495084970047 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0270428514264 0.0843802449381 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0756988638202 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.018532160424 0.0819641961636 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.