The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
The tables present the amount of fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas sold in 1994 and 2004 in UK, Switzerland, Denmark, Belgium and Sweden.
Overall, UK had the most proportion of sales of coffee in while the biggest number of money from bananas sold were in Switzerland both 1994 and 2004.
In 1994, the figure of money from coffee brought in UK was only at 1.5 millions of euros which dramatically increased to reach a peak at 20 millions of euros in 2004. In addition, the income from coffee sold in Switzerland in 2004 grew in double rate in comparison with that in 1999 which was from 3 to 6 millions. Whereas, Sweden had the lest sales of coffee in both years that were only approximately 0.9 millions. On the other hand, the money from bananas bought of Switzerland witnessed the significant increase which in 2004 was about three times as much as that in 1999. The sale of bananas in Belgium, which was the least out of all countries in 1999, about 0.6 millions went up considerably to 4 millions. Moreover, there was a considerable reduction in sales of bananas in Denmark from 1999 to 2004 which make this country gain the last place in sales of bananas out of five countries in 2004.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 70, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '5 million'.
Suggestion: 5 million
...from coffee brought in UK was only at 1.5 millions of euros which dramatically increased to r...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 138, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '20 million'.
Suggestion: 20 million
...amatically increased to reach a peak at 20 millions of euros in 2004. In addition, the income ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, whereas, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 990.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64788732394 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71723526726 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492957746479 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.579320919 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 123.75 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.625 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286675056874 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142956015352 0.103423049105 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653795542592 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205928483976 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503314874364 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.