The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
The two tables illustrate how much Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas sold in five different nations in Europe from 1999 to 2004. All figures are given in millions of euros.
Overall, it is clear that while most of the amount of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas consumed experienced an upward trend in the examined period, the opposite was true for sales of bananas in Sweden and Denmark.
A close examination of the first table reveals a dramatic increase in Fairtrade-labelled coffee in the UK, from 1.5 to 20. The latter of which was the largest figure in 2004. Meanwhile, the sales for this product in Switzerland was the highest in 1999 at 3 before increasing twofold in 2004. In comparison, for the other 3 countries, there was a slight increase of 0.2 in both Denmark and Sweden, while Belgium upped by 0.7 to 1.7 in 2004.
In the second table, it is noticeable that Switzerland had the largest bananas sales with a significant rise, from 15 to 47. In contrast, the UK and Belgium also witnessed a moderate increase, to 5.5 and 4 respectively. However, Sweden and Denmark showed an opposite pattern, with a downward trend from 1.8 and 2 to 1 and 0.9 respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ales of bananas in Sweden and Denmark. A close examination of the first table r...
^^^
Line 7, column 126, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...with a significant rise, from 15 to 47. In contrast, the UK and Belgium also witne...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 987.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86206896552 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11622983719 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56157635468 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6523311315 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284652729823 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101232338834 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100644007058 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177726003121 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0871775215665 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.