The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words

The given maps compare an island before and after the introduction of numerous tourist amenities.
Looking at the two maps, it can be readily apparent that the island has been inverted, turning into a touristic area instead of a deserted one. While the trees remain unchanged after the construction, more houses along with a restaurant and reception were added in the heart of the island. Furthermore, infrastructure such as a pier, footpath or vehicle track were also erected in this area to boost tourism.
Starting at the pier where tourists arrive, it is obvious that there is a reception right on the opposite side and people can get there through the vehicle track. Behind the reception is a restaurant and similarly, travelers can arrive there with the newly constructed track for vehicles. To the East of the central area, a significant number of accommodation has appeared and they are all connected together by a circular footpath.
On the other side of the reception, it is pretty similar to the Eastern side since houses were built and commuters can use footpath to walk around the area. However, a noticeable difference witnessed is that in addition to the aforementioned footpath, there is another footpath leading to the beach where tourists can swim and partake in other underwater activities.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 367, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...partake in other underwater activities.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, look, similarly, so, while, in addition, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1099.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08796296296 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86779678533 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606481481481 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 350.1 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.7051352754 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.111111111 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88888888889 5.23603664747 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127848086284 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577090568719 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659953043985 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0982233763428 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0724275103726 0.0819641961636 88% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.