The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourists facilities. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisions where relevant.
The graphs illustrate how an island was changed after building a number of construction for tourists.
Overall, it is noticeable that in the mainland there were many accommodations connected by both footpath and vehicle tracks. Furthermore, although man-made facilities were built, they did not affect the nature resources.
As can be seen obviously, the first map shows nothing except an empty land with several trees growing but the second one illustrates an addition of construction of some tourist facilities. There were a reception in the center of the area, a big restaurant on the north of the island and a quantity of residential areas linked by the walking paths.
On the east side of the island, it used to have a beach next to the sea and now became a swimming place for the visitors to relax. Thus, people could take a short walk on the paths from where they lived to this areas without using any transportations. On the other hands, there was a pier being set up on the south of the reception where boats and ships were landed. Travelers may need to use some vehicles to go to the main reception since it was the only road provided from the pier to the facilities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 207, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...k on the paths from where they lived to this areas without using any transportations...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, may, second, so, thus, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 974.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70531400966 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7340349132 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642512077295 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.1625195653 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.222222222 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161466962564 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0564032904524 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542241809107 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0939641734218 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529535550307 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.