thevline graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian from 1975 to 2000.

Essay topics:

thevline graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian from 1975 to 2000.

The given line graph compares the fast food consumption of Australian teenagers between 1975 to 2000.

The most striking feature to be observed is that hamburgers and pizzas was gaining prevalence among youngster.

It can be vividly seen that from 1975 to 1995, the use of pizza upsurged from 1 to 80 times a year. Between 1995 to 2000, the trend of eating pizza stayed constant at 85 times a year. Further, from 1975 to 1985, the figure of fish and chips followed a decreasing trend falling from 100 to 80 times a year . The use of fish and chips was 65 times a year but it curtailed to 39 times a year in 2000.

Turning to rest of description, between 1975 to 1985, the figure of hamburgers made a remarkable improvement, rising from 10 to 85 tines a year.after that it upsurge slowly. As far as comparison is concerned, In the starting years young people prefer more fish and chips but it declined sharply compare to pizza and hamburgers.in 1990, the consumption of pizza's overtook the consumption of fish and chips.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 305, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...rend falling from 100 to 80 times a year . The use of fish and chips was 65 times ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.48453608247 80% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 5.05154639175 158% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 32.9175257732 21% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 26.3917525773 133% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.85567010309 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 846.0 937.175257732 90% => OK
No of words: 182.0 206.0 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64835164835 4.54256449028 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.78020617076 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69095585125 2.54303337028 106% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 127.690721649 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532967032967 0.622605031667 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 233.1 290.88556701 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.41237113402 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 8.0 0.824742268041 970% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 1.44329896907 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 16.3608247423 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.4405878442 44.8134815571 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.75 76.5299724578 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 16.8248392259 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.875 4.34317383033 20% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 7.41237113402 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.94845360825 127% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151996999734 0.216113520407 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0831716546667 0.0766984524023 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0926562482666 0.0603063233224 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112877512392 0.12726935374 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116997976553 0.0580467560999 202% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 8.37731958763 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 70.7449484536 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 7.45979381443 111% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 8.71597938144 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 7.59969072165 108% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 41.2886597938 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 8.62886597938 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 8.54432989691 126% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 8.15463917526 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.