some people believe that construction of new public buildings such as museum town hall and sporting facility is more important than renovation of the existing ones, while others disagree. discuss both views.
Old buildings are the pride and heritage of a nation. Presently, it is reckned by some masses that government should spend money on public eminities such as museum, town hall, sports playground and many others. On the other side, people have conflicting views. Here, I would like to account both the view points with my own perception.
Manifold points are there to support the former view. First and foremost, spending money on new buildings,museum,and sports facilities not only uplift the standard of nation but also confer modern eminities for masses to fulfill desire needs. Apart from it, design of new buildings enhance the number of toriusm as plethora of visitors visit new building in order to see the new architectural skills of modern museum and other places. Thus, construction of new buildings boost the economy of a country. Moreover, the design of old buildings are outdated the interior decoration, sitting plan, parking not well planned according to the masses requirements. As a result, design of new buildings more convenient for people.
Numerous points support the latter view. Initially, historical buildings depict the background of a country.people accumulate more knowledge about the architectural skills and lifestyle of ancient people through these buildings. Furthermore, renovation of old building require less money and less burden on administration.To be specific, design of new buildings require hefty amount of money in order to complete the modern facilities. It leads to astronomical outlays. Governments find difficulties to manage the budget. Thence, renovation of existing buildings are lucrative rather than new buildings.
To recapitulate, Undeniably,the design of new buildings is going to be fruitful.However, still I believe that renovation of existing buildings put less burden on government.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 106, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , museum
...oremost, spending money on new buildings,museum,and sports facilities not only uplift t...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 441, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of modern museum and other places. Thus, construction of new buildings boost the ...
^^
Line 3, column 670, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to the masses requirements. As a result, design of new buildings more convenient ...
^^
Line 5, column 204, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l skills and lifestyle of ancient people through these buildings. Furthermore, r...
^^
Line 5, column 325, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: To
...money and less burden on administration.To be specific, design of new buildings re...
^^
Line 7, column 28, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...ildings. To recapitulate, Undeniably,the design of new buildings is going to be ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 81, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...f new buildings is going to be fruitful.However, still I believe that renovation of exi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, still, then, thus, well, apart from, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60357142857 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22335031371 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582142857143 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 62.3593781361 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2941176471 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4705882353 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.17647058824 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319221280278 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0877584058903 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069635788849 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185883569353 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325117022662 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.9 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.