Write a letter to a city planning manager about demolition of a historical building in your area and say
– Explain why it shouldn’t be demolished.
– Suggest a future use for this building.
– Recommend a way to raise money for repairs.
Dear Sir,
I am writing this letter with regards to the decision of the city council, to demolish the Sanskrit Library, which was erected in 1820.
This library is part of our city history, many freedom movements were initiated from here by educating the people and providing knowledge to masses. Though books are not in good condition, however, they can be refurbished for readers interested in history. Furthermore, most of the books are in the Sanskrit language, which is rare to find these days.
In my opinion, if the authorities repair and construct this historic library, it can be made available for the students and readers for studying purpose, as there is only one library apart from this in the entire city. So reconstructing this building will be beneficial for society and educational purpose.
Taking nominal fees from the visitors, and also by taking monetary charges by allowing authors and booksellers to have their stalls and shops in this premises money could be raised for the repairing purpose.
I request you to take back the decision of demolishing the library, instead, it could be used for the better purpose of society.
Yours faithfully,
Shreyas Parab
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 194, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... books are not in good condition however they can be refurbished for readers inte...
^^
Line 8, column 150, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'premises'' or 'premise's'?
Suggestion: premises'; premise's
... to have their stalls and shops in this premises money could be raised for the repairing...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, so, apart from, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.48453608247 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 4.92783505155 101% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 5.05154639175 139% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 32.9175257732 52% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 26.3917525773 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 980.0 937.175257732 105% => OK
No of words: 195.0 206.0 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02564102564 4.54256449028 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.78020617076 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58312940596 2.54303337028 102% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 127.690721649 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610256410256 0.622605031667 98% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 290.88556701 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.13402061856 44% => OK
Article: 0.0 0.824742268041 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 1.44329896907 69% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 12.6804123711 8% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 195.0 16.3608247423 1192% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 44.8134815571 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 980.0 76.5299724578 1281% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 195.0 16.8248392259 1159% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 61.0 4.34317383033 1405% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 7.41237113402 13% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.94845360825 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267391775878 0.216113520407 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.267391775878 0.0766984524023 349% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0603063233224 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140355425922 0.12726935374 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557442157863 0.0580467560999 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 99.8 8.37731958763 1191% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -126.45 70.7449484536 -179% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 3.82989690722 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 79.3 7.45979381443 1063% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.08 8.71597938144 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 16.95 7.59969072165 223% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 45.0 41.2886597938 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 57.0 8.62886597938 661% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 80.0 8.54432989691 936% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 80.0 8.15463917526 981% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.