The animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in sea. What are the reasons and solutions?
It is widespread practice that human beings has pushed the fauna on the verge of extinction due to intensively industrialized activities on the land and marine areas. Below are some explanations for this phenomenon, followed by the feasible solutions in order to preserve the animal species.
One the one hand, there is some reasons as to why human activities pose a threat on the existence of some animals. The first prominent cause is that deforestation or illegal land explotation has triggered the loss of inhabitats for the wild animals, aiming to serve industrialisation and modernization. For instance, people have the tendency to cut down trees zones for the construction of infrastructure or tourism areas to meet growing people’s demand.
As a result, The animal species are compelled to leave their inhabitats for seeking the food resources and new homes for survive. The second issue is that the intensity in terms of exploiting marine resources has been more concerned in these days. It is not unusual that some human activities involving catching fish or minerals exploitation under the sea brings considerably income for locals. Therefore, some marine species are more likely to suffer diseases or death from leaking oil or capture by the electric tools.
One the other hand, some measures are essential to taken on the protection of these fauna and flora. Initially, The government need to take the responsibily on the perservation their nation’s resources by impose strictly policies, even imprision related to banning deforestation or poaching. The following solution is that organiszations such as NGOs take some projects of searching the vulnerability in modern life and raising donation to perform specific stratetries. Last but not least, individuals have to go hand in hand by raising awareness of the adverse reccurpersions of excessively nature exploitation.
In conclusion, it seems to me that culprits for above scenario are atributed to deforestation or intensive harness of natural resources. Furthermore, there are lot of measures to rescue the endanger species from disapperance in the near future
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... order to preserve the animal species. One the one hand, there is some reasons ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 25, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are some reasons'?
Suggestion: there are some reasons
...nimal species. One the one hand, there is some reasons as to why human activities pose a threa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat the intensity in terms of exploiting marine resources has been more concerned...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... oil or capture by the electric tools. One the other hand, some measures are es...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 86, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this fauna' or 'these faunae', 'these faunas'?
Suggestion: this fauna; these faunae; these faunas
...essential to taken on the protection of these fauna and flora. Initially, The government ne...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ns of excessively nature exploitation. In conclusion, it seems to me that culpr...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 191, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...re, there are lot of measures to rescue the endanger species from disapperance in the near f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, second, so, therefore, as to, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1811.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42215568862 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22955094136 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580838323353 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 589.5 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.3779256935 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 120.733333333 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2666666667 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18239612493 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0532473015605 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063502083854 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.098296525486 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0812528309738 0.056905535591 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.