The animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in sea. What are the reasons and solutions?
In this day and age, the phenomenon of animal’s disappearance which is brought on by human destructive actions on both land and in the ocean has been transpiring. Deforestation and overfishing are two core grounds which can be radically tackled by enforcing stricter rules and organizing protecting animals events.
Admittedly, it is visible that there are a multitude of roots leading to the extinction of animals. To be more specific, regarding land, a handful of residents are inclined to deforest in order to make way for agriculture and farming. Evidently, a massive portion of virgin forests have vanished ; it signifies that myriad species are gradually in a state of evaporation due to their habitat loss. Furthermore, in the sea, the act of overfishing is considered to result in this practice. It is undisputed that people currently catch fish as well as other sea creatures without any restriction. Thus, legion sorts of marine species are no longer found in the ocean compared to the past.
In the interim, there are a wide range of measures that people can apply to address the extinction of animals these days. First off, the authorities ought to enforce stricter rules to prevent this practice. If there are some people who have a tendency to cause animals’ loss, they have to be punished by going to prison rather than being fined by money. Second, it is imperative for local inhabitants to organize the events about preserving animals every month. Practically, this kind of event can raise other people’s awareness about the essence of animals and promote them to protect those who are endangered.
To sum up, the animal disappearance can be caused by deforestation and overfishing which can be sorted out by setting tighter regulations and holding protective campaigns.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 138, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...orted out by setting tighter regulations and holding protective campaigns.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, regarding, second, so, thus, well, kind of, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12969283276 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95805162489 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60409556314 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.9451880227 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.357142857 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35714285714 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158535834909 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0508522562663 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0288381293215 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0887098684651 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396470328459 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 138, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...orted out by setting tighter regulations and holding protective campaigns.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, regarding, second, so, thus, well, kind of, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12969283276 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95805162489 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60409556314 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.9451880227 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.357142857 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35714285714 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158535834909 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0508522562663 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0288381293215 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0887098684651 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396470328459 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.