Technology has become part and parcel in people’s life, eventually, it can be seen that technology, such as laptops, and tablets are increasingly used in the educational process. This tendency has both drawbacks in the form deprivation of human interaction and advantages such as instant access to the information and opportunity to enhance learning productivity. From my point of view, computers bring a more positive contribution to the studying process.
To begin with, computers may deprive students of real human interaction. In particular, it seems to negatively affect young pupils who have not to develop useful social skills yet. This is because face-to-face interaction with peers as well as with teachers gives rise to gain valuable skills such as negotiation with understanding body language, empathy and debate. It is therefore clear that overusing computers in a classroom may hinder progress in developing communication skills and probably might be negative in a long-term perspective.
However, despite obvious flaws computers are vital in gaining knowledge. Firstly, it allows getting instant access to the various information around the world by means of not only the Internet but also information carriers such as CD disks, USB flash cards. In addition, all resources can be provided in a user-friendly interface and an understandable way for young students. Secondly, student productivity of learning may drastically increase due to attractive enrichment of the educational process. This is important since sophisticated information which would be described by a thousand words would have grasped effectively using realistic pictures and videos. To illustrate, instead of reading a description of historical events, a virtual reality tour of the occasion can be watched. Therefore, the advantages of computers overweight disadvantages.
In conclusion, nowadays technology is momentous in studying. Although, it may have a negative effect on developing social skills among students due to lack of real communication, I believe, that advantages in the form of endless possibility to find a wide range of information and improve the unimaginative educational process with interactive resources.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in addition, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1886.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69788519637 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32983146497 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604229607251 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.3875181122 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.875 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6875 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0625 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1751828282 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0568971404619 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508591446611 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10334884445 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366767202172 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in addition, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1886.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69788519637 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32983146497 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604229607251 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.3875181122 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.875 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6875 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0625 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1751828282 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0568971404619 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508591446611 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10334884445 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366767202172 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.