With globalization and latest technology released, people can purchase the same products on the internet or in international markets so the difference between nations is minimal than before. I firmly believe that the drawbacks outweigh the advantages.
On the one hand, thanks to the advances in technology, people can order oversea product online without difficulties. For example, people in Taiwan can purchase fish from Japan on the website, and the fresh seafood will deliver to their doors in few days. Besides, it is convenient for international business to sell their cargo all over the world. Fishermen can not only sell their seafood to the local fish markets, delivering oversea as a commercial operation is a trend too.
However, the distinction between countries will become hard to recognize than before on the basis that the local products are possible to be stop selling. Moreover, if every countries in the world sell the similar products, it will have some detrimental problems like less variety of local shops. For instance, people are able to buy things anywhere now so that the fashion will dominate what kind of products should be produced. In order to meet customer's expectation, companies are prone to produce the most popular type of products. Therefore, local products may suffer from failing customers imagination, which in turn attract less consumers to purchase.
In conclusion, although the benefits of less distinction between nations are obvious, it is clear to me that the drawbacks are significant than the benefits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 448, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'customers'' or 'customer's'?
Suggestion: customers'; customer's
...ts should be produced. In order to meet customers expectation, companies are prone to pro...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 632, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun consumers is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...mers imagination, which in turn attract less consumers to purchase. In conclusion...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1312.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 247.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31174089069 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8383540997 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603238866397 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9595012824 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.333333333 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5833333333 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.41666666667 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137971633142 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0454684794009 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443171262276 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0667458363034 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532091650586 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.