countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.
do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, we live in an era where globalisation, technology and tourism, have brought countries all over the world closer to each other. While I agree with the freedom that everyone has today to purchase goods from different parts of the world, I believe that the drawbacks of this development outrage the benefits.
The society we live in today is clearly highly consumptive. By this I mean we consume mass-produced commodities in abundance, and with the help of technology, we can share them with the rest of the world. As a result, this big amount of products laid on the production of further waste and pollution. Furthermore, globalisation has allowed business becoming increasingly international, with agreements for open trade facilities between countries, which means goods are manufactured in one country and sold in many others. Although it encourages investments and can help reduce poverty in the less developed countries, where labour is cheaper, global trade has its black side, which is the exploit of the workers from the companies in those countries.
Another negative impact of global trade is that today nations are losing their identity and traditions. While before there was more awareness about national rots, in our days we are becoming more and more the same, aspiring to western societies, and forgetting what makes us unique. For example, tourist instead of tasting the cuisine of the visited nations often prefer to consume meals at Mac Donalds, or food chains like this, thus the host countries adapt their cuisine to the tourist. Even the dress code is becoming the same globally. The influence of social media has played a major role in this phenomenon advertising in real-time the latest fashion trends worldwide.
In conclusion, global trade has its positives sides, such as bounding countries economically more easily, but those sides produce negative results in our world making our communities more consumptive causing environmental damages and contributing on fading nationals traditions in many countries.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, thus, while, as to, for example, i mean, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1729.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35294117647 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89110382772 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628482972136 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.2478081231 49.4020404114 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8461538462 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84615384615 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2282733282 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706006014337 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545642590448 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131331179347 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392007381926 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.