With the development of online communication, people will never be alone and will always be able to make new friends. To what extent do you agree?
In contemporary settings, every individual become netizen because internet become major part of daily basis including online communication. Therefore, with the progression of this, people will find company and novel peers. I completely agree with this notion and reasons are explained in the forthcoming paragraphs.
To begin with, nowadays, technology become too vast which is processed to the internet. Online conversation become also usual in present duration. Because, every youngster and all age decades utilise social media and websites due to which they do not become alone. Thus, there are plethora of positive aspects of online communication. The first and foremost is savage of time. In this criteria, if individuals communicate via online webs with their peers, thus, they save their cost effective time. Because, they do not have necessity to travel for long distance to meet their friends in person. They conversate with their love once on social sites at any time on chats as well as on video conferences even in their busy hectic schedule. As a result, they share their opinions, problems and such things via online web which make them feel comfortable and not to be alone at any time.
Furthermore, the another factor is availability to contact with anyone world widely. There are plenty of website which are preferable in mobile phones through which individuals make online friends. In this manner, individuals become able to boost their confidence in conversation skills. They also get knowledge regarding the culture and society sectors by exchanging their opinions which another once on social sites. As a result, this becomes incline in their informative and communicative skills. Apart from that, in present duration, youngsters seek for superior company therefore they also make novel peers according to their choise and comfortability.
To recapitulate, according to my outlook, online communication has numerous positive impressions such as savage of cost effective time without any physical efforts, exchanging of ideas and so on.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 381, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...irst and foremost is savage of time. In this criteria, if individuals communicate vi...
^^^^
Line 3, column 96, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun website seems to be countable; consider using: 'plenty of websites'.
Suggestion: plenty of websites
...act with anyone world widely. There are plenty of website which are preferable in mobile phones t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, look, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, apart from, such as, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1740.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4375 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86241129775 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5875 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.9008554128 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5789473684 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8421052632 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153228239229 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.047400933378 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0364192877441 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.088413254424 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353017096471 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.