Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Considering the best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide, I am strongly inclined to take the side of this statement particularly in the entertainment trip. As far as I am concerned, regarding the importance advantages of the tour guide presence such as their useful experiences, their knowledge, their preemptive actions, etc, the tour guide can be implied as inseparable part of all trips. To elaborate more on the topic mentioned, the following reasons and examples will be presented.
First and foremost, tour guides have sufficient and enormous information about the destiny such as route, the interesting places for visiting and the culture. They categorically know which places are worth watching. Thus, the visitors should not pay money for the typical and boring places. Moreover, tour guides identify the best hotels for accommodation.
Aside from the point I made above, being one of the most proliferated topic in all trips, the time management plays a crucial role in the quality of traveling. It is crystal clear that there is a causal relationship between the alacrity of traveling on the one hand and the sufficient time to visit all favorite places on the other hand. Needless to say, the tour guide have enough experiences to estimate the appropriate time for all parts of the travelling such as visiting monuments, shopping souvenirs, rest, etc.
Another primary reason can be attributed to the suitable decisions in the critical conditions. For instance, if something bad happens to the visitors that might threaten the health of them, the tour guide absolutely is familiar with perfect solution for preventing harmful effects. It is also worth nothing that the tour guide should have thorough knowledge and experiences consisting all necessary aspects of the traveling and on contrary the presence of amateur tour guide cannot be indicated as an essential advantage.
Taking all these perspectives into account, I highly put emphasis on the necessity of a tour guide presence in the journey regarding the fundamental advantages of their presence including sufficient knowledge, making decisive decisions and time management. Although, these subjects, to my best knowledge, are denoted as substantial advantages in the entertainment trip, in work traveling the experienced guide can be implied as a perfect adviser.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1985.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 374.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30748663102 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98606125387 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542780748663 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 623.7 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.5174109082 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.333333333 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9333333333 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155741394979 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0564875261208 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632203667049 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0890784875792 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0712738918304 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.