Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Classmates are a more important influence than parents on a child’s success in school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Considering the importance of parents role or the impact of classmates on the child's success, I am strongly inclined to take the side of the latter one. Regarding the psychological aspects and the different between the generations, the effect of classmates on the children behaviors are categorically higher than the parents. To elaborate more on the topic mentioned, the following reasons and examples will be presented.
First and foremost, the psychological aspects put emphasis on the fact that most of the children have remarkable tendency to communicate with their peers more perfectly well compared with their parents. Being one of the most proliferated well-known subject in this category, the children's age plays critical role. For instance, in the day care center, a child highly likely desire to sheds initial communication with the children who thinks have same ages. The communication with older children or even with the teachers places in second and third priorities, respectively. Needless to say, the children want to copy the behavior's pattern of their classmates. For example, if children recognize that one of their classmates achieves the appraised goal, the would absolutely done the same behavior or same endeavor to reach it. This can give a credit to the importance of the classmate influence on the child's success.
Another primary reason can be ascribed as the different paradigms between the mind of the children and their parents. As the current psychological surveys reveal, most of the children from the earlier to higher ages even during the university education periods, dramatically think that their parents belong to the antediluvian generation. This believe leads to emergence of some controversial behavior that they never tend to imitate their parents methods in the life. Regarding this issue, not only the parent previous success cannot be marked as the ideal thing but also the children prefer to find other disciplines for success. Even the definition of success from one generation to another would immensely be different. Thus, the vital role of the classmate to determine and define the success of children becomes crystal clear.
Taking all of these perspectives into account, in comparison with the impact of the parents, I cannot agree more with the more effective role of the children's classmates on their success. Although the critical role of the parents to control the children communication cannot be ignored, in my opinion, the influence of the classmates in most of the cases are more than what can be expected.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 345, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'belief' (noun) instead of believe (verb)?
Suggestion: belief
...ng to the antediluvian generation. This believe leads to emergence of some controversia...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, regarding, second, so, third, thus, well, for example, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2165.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 409.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29339853301 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88847962475 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498777506112 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 675.9 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9605929179 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.277777778 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7222222222 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19683308039 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0730841581136 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609548922406 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150672796305 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549223538179 0.0645574589148 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.