Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Face-to-face communication is better than other types of communication, such as letters, email, or telephone calls. Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.
Being one of the most proliferated social science topic in communication, I am strongly inclined to take the side of face-to-face communication as a perfect and better type of communication compared with other options. It goes without saying that finding an effective way to communicate is absolutely associated with regarding psychological and linguistic aspects. Besides, it is obvious that the goal of communication (i.g. commercial communications, friendship communication, scientific communication, etc) remarkably affects the communication mechanism. Considering the effective parameters in a typical communication, however, I exactly feel that face-to-face communication can implied as best one. To elaborate more on the topic mentioned, the following reasons and examples will be presented.
First and foremost, face-to face communication brings about an effective transmission of what is precisely implied. As current psychological researches utter, in the face-to-face communication particularly characterized negotiation, the mutual emotion among members can be responded perfectly. For instance, even from the mimic of faces, any member of special the meeting can guess the emotional reaction of others to manage the negotiation in logical directions. They undoubtedly prevent to illustrate some matters that lead to loosing the temper of others. On contrary, in the other communication methods such as letter, email or telephone calls, the lack of mutual transmission of emotional responses might impressively affect the main goal of communication that lead to some misunderstandings. In addition, in the face-to-face communication some physical behaviors can be useful to evoke better comprehension when it comes to complicated and hard-understanding subjects.
Another primary reason can be ascribed to the intrinsic tendency of the face-to-face communication in long time communications. For examples, in a long discussion, the remote communication methods such as email, telephone calls, etc may be boring compared with the face-to-face communication. It goes without saying, in the remote communication nobody has sense of other side feeling to terminate the discussion or keep it on.
Taking all these perspectives into account, I cannot agree more about the priority of face-to-face communication as more appropriate method regarding the effective transmission of emotional feelings, and prevention of boring. Although, in my best knowledge, in some situations specially long distance communications, the remote communications can be indicated as a last resort, it is more advisable to put an emphasis in the face-to-face communication in usual conditions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 689, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'as the best'.
Suggestion: as the best
... face-to-face communication can implied as best one. To elaborate more on the topic men...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 530, Rule ID: LOOSING_EFFORTRECORDSEASON[1]
Message: Did you mean 'losing the'?
Suggestion: losing the
...to illustrate some matters that lead to loosing the temper of others. On contrary, in the o...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, if, may, regarding, so, for example, for instance, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 29.0 8.0752688172 359% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2301.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 383.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.00783289817 4.8611393121 124% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.74472248716 2.67179642975 140% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545691906005 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 745.2 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.51630824373 125% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6703867565 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.8125 100.406767564 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9375 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330624433548 0.236089414692 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121721200743 0.076458572812 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731984637985 0.0737576698707 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224172650675 0.150856017488 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466351314396 0.0645574589148 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 11.7677419355 160% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 58.1214874552 39% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.10430107527 213% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.1575268817 156% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.87 10.9000537634 164% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.01818996416 124% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 86.8835125448 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.