Some items (such as clothes or furniture) can be made by hand or by machine. Which do you prefer - items made by hand or items made by machine? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your choice.
Considering making things (such as clothes or furniture) using by hand or machine, I am strongly inclined to take the side of using the machines regarding the substantial advantages such as the accuracy, the high speed of production, and the cost efficiency. Although, I think an appropriate answer is highly related to the personal viewpoints which highly depends that I respond to the question as the producer or as the consumer. Considering as a producer, I prefer items made by machine. To elaborate more on the topic mentioned, the following reasons and examples will be presented.
First and foremost, to produce any thing the cost can be considered as a crucial factor. It goes without saying that stuff produced by hand is more expensive compared with that fabricated by machine. For example, if I buy furniture which made by hand, I noticeably confide that my furniture dimensions and even all the measurement associating with fabrication process made in the high precision. In addition, the computers capabilities provide the situation that the producers can systematize the machines by the special programs. Therefore, the precision to make particular item can increase remarkably. Besides, the producer can configure more innovations in the items by alternation of the design and arrangement of items elements.
Another primary reason can be attributed to the production cost of item. Regarding the high cost of professional workers as well as the causal relationship between the production cost of items on the one hand and the human work time on the other hand, it is crystal clear that the items which made by machines are more cost effective than others. For instance, the machine made carpets are more cheap than the carpet which fabricated by hand. Although, fabricating some art works such as carpet, the merits of items which made by hand is much more than those made by machines, for the typical things the preference of using machines is proven.
Aside from the point I made above, as far as the producer is concerned, in comparison with items made by hand, the production of the items using the machines can achieve in much more speed. This can be ascribed as a main reason than in all industries the machines are in high level priority compared with the workers to enhance the production rate.
Taking all these perspectives into account, I cannot agree more about the main advantages of items made by machines regarding the production cost, production speed, and finally accuracy. Although, as a customer I prefer to buy the hand made items considering the merits of art associated with them, for a producer it is more advisable to use machines.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 586, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reasons and examples will be presented. First and foremost, to produce any thing...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'anything'?
Suggestion: anything
...ed. First and foremost, to produce any thing the cost can be considered as a crucial...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, first, if, regarding, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2238.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 443.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05191873589 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85103814228 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.453724604966 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 721.8 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.9931437151 48.9658058833 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.333333333 100.406767564 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6111111111 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.45110844103 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.477458979254 0.236089414692 202% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171779773941 0.076458572812 225% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105077808424 0.0737576698707 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.305149711185 0.150856017488 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0518239108317 0.0645574589148 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.