Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, one of the most significant issues having occupied the minds of pedagogical authorities in the developing countries is whether or not increasing the professors' salaries at the universities will be beneficial. In this respect, some people emphasize that professors earn money adequately, while others claim that the universities should spend more money on their salaries. In my mind, the latter groups' opinion seems more rational due to chief reasons being discussed in the following paragraphs.
First of all, increasing the professors' salaries at the universities makes the university more credible and prestigious. These days, universities are really concerned about their world university ranking, and try very hard to boost their rank in the world. This is not accomplished unless they try to gather the most sedulous and genius students in the world. The more universities increase the professors' income, the more they are able to hire talented students in their research group. For instance, my father is a university professor majoring in mechanical engineering. In past, he was not able to hire as many students as he desired since his fund was limited. However, after the university increased his salary, he could accept more students in his research group y offering them more financial aid and took different industrial projects in that more students could get involved. As a result, the number of projects implemented by the university boosted, and the ranking of the university was reinforced after months.
Moreover, another reason motivating me to agree with the idea of increasing professor's salaries is a recent study having been done by the researchers of Harvard University, whose abstract published in their quarterly. It reveals that professors who earn more salaries do their jobs more enthusiastically. Furthermore, Carl Gustav Jung, a noted Swiss psychologist, asserts in one his most notable works that the most important factor to encourage people to do something is motivation, which is earning more money to many people. Hence, the more professors earn, the more motivated they teach. Plus, students enjoy attending classes whose professor teaches precisely and willingly. If the professors lose their motivation to teach, the students will lose their motivation to learn as well.
To wrap it up, it is essential to bear in mind that professors need to be paid more so that the university will be more prestigious in the world by accepting more talented students. In addition, university professors need motivation to teach, as well as the students who need motivation to learn. Therefore, not only had the university authorities better increase professors' salaries, but also the students should recommend them to do so, too.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...horities in the developing countries is whether or not increasing the professors salaries at t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 396, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...rld. The more universities increase the professors income, the more they are able to hire ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 575, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'In the past'?
Suggestion: In the past
...sor majoring in mechanical engineering. In past, he was not able to hire as many studen...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, really, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, in addition, as a result, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2338.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 435.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37471264368 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97984953259 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512643678161 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 725.4 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0626894901 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.9 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35 5.45110844103 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218813779804 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0797102602964 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513175795161 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147117865398 0.150856017488 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305748409851 0.0645574589148 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.